Skip to main content

CYNICS AND CRITICS


I love movies. I always have, so naturally, I took a course in film arts and though I’ve forgotten the intricacies, (the year was 1973); I still appreciate the art form.

For instance, the mood or tone of a movie begins with the opening music and credits. That whole thing has been crafted to set what the director thinks the tone of the movie should convey.

The goal of a film is to convince you, as the viewer, to willingly suspend your disbelief. The colour, texture, the music, camera angles and even the pace of the edit and scene changes, all conspire with the actors, the dialogue and the costumes, to make you lose your ascetic distance and become part of the experience. You, as the viewer, are persuaded to be part of the film and not apart from it. Movie viewing is intended as an inclusive experience.

The part of the bargain, the quid pro quo, when you pay for a ticket or a rental fee, is that you will put aside your cynicism and critique and allow the film the opportunity to create an alternative reality of which you are willingly a part.

None of this is possible if you are with people who insist on talking during the film. Interjecting their opinions about plot structure, acting ability or cinematography, causes you to be pulled back from the experience you paid for and can ruin a film’s chance of working it’s magic. Blurting out things like, “hey, is that the guy from…” or “my cousin has a dress like hers…” is torture for film aficionados. It violently rips them from the world so delicately created by the director and unceremoniously dumps them back into the real world. Now, to enjoy the film, they have to try anew to get back to the point where their disbelief was happily suspended.

With all that said, it is well within the right of the viewer to walk out on a bad film. If one has given the film every chance to weave it’s magic but it has failed to accomplish the goal, whether due to plot, poor writing, poor acting or poor direction, then by all means, walk out. And when asked or if you are so inclined, write about your experience. Yes, it is okay to inform others of your opinion, to discuss the film with some knowledge, just don't do it while the movie is playing.

When considering a movie, I look for three main things, in no particular order, preference or importance. I look for actors I have seen and liked in other performances. Sometimes, a good actor can save a bad movie or at the very least give the viewer a performance worth the price of admission despite the shortcomings of the film. James Stewart, Haille Berry, Tom Hanks, Meryl Streep, De Niro, Pacino, Diane Ladd, Cate Blanchett, Jessica Lange, Denzel Washington, Cuba Gooding Jr., to name a few of my favourites. There are many more, please don’t read anything into this list or my list of directors.

Likewise, I consider the director of films I have seen before and enjoyed. Ridley Scott, David Lean, Antoine Fuqua, John Ford, Spike Lee, Alfred Hitchcock, Brian De Palma, Sam Peckinpah, Steven Spielberg, Steven Soderbergh, Ron Howard, Kathyrn Bigelow, Nora Ephron are just a few of many I consider when choosing a movie.

If I see a movie starring actors I am not too familiar with or directed by someone whose work I don’t know, I will consider the writer of the screenplay or the book the movie is based upon. The plot must interest me. They say there are seven basic movie plots; Overcoming the Monster, Rags to Riches, The Quest, Voyage and Return, Comedy, Tragedy and Rebirth.

I was taught drama was conflict and usually consisted of man against nature, man against himself, man against man, man against society, man against gods or fate. And of course, there is the familiar motif of the man who becomes a hero, who becomes a god or something like it, King Arthur comes to mind. Joseph Campbell wrote about this motif as the hero with a thousand faces. George Lucas consulted Campbell when he was making Star Wars.

It is important to understand what you like. Going to a movie that holds no appeal for you is counter-productive and sure to be a waste of both your time and your money. For me, I do not enjoy musicals. The singing interrupts the drama for me; it pulls me back from the reality created by the piece. I have tried, but I simply do not enjoy musicals. Two notable exceptions come to mind, Fiddler on the Roof and Phantom of the Opera. And I must say, I think I would enjoy them more as a musical play rather than as a film. I know, that’s an obvious given, but we are talking only about the films here.

I love movies and taking into consideration the caveats I mentioned, parking your cynicism and critique at the door when you enter a movie theatre or rent a film at home, promotes a better movie experience by at least giving the film a chance to work its movie magic.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

21st CENTURY QUIXOTIC MAN

Maybe I'm old, but I find it increasingly more difficult to gather legitimate informative news articles. Sources are questionable, I fact check, but then the integrity of the fact checkers is called into question. I have a job, a family, and other interests. I am busy trying to live my life. When I'm on the net, especially Facebook, it is in between tasks and I'm on the move. I am not writing a doctoral dissertation, merely commenting on something that catches my eye. Yes, I get caught up in defending my opinion. And it is hard to admit that it is only opinion; I have no access to state information, I have no poli-sci degree, I'm just commenting about what I read. If I had expertise or knowledge no one else had I would get myself into a position where I could employ my specific set of skills and knowledge to effect change. I wouldn't spend hours on Facebook telling everyone they were being duped. I'm just a blue collar worker close to retirement, tir...

My Mother

My mother has died. That somber fact has me processing thoughts of guilt, love, and my own mortality. I am officially an orphan. My mother was one of the “Railway Children,” those Liverpool kids sent to the countryside to escape the bombing during World War II. She and her sister were sent to Wales and were bounced from household to household, relative to relative, and finally to an orphanage. Dad moved to Canada in 1960 to forge a better a life for us. Before my mum took my sister and I to join him, the family held an “American wake,” a mournful goodbye, as if a loved one had died. Mum left everything and everybody she ever knew to join her husband in the new world. My mother and father worked hard to give us a good life. There were tough times, money was scarce, and there was tension between my parents. Hell, let me be honest, my father hit my mother, I saw it. My mum was sixty when she left my dad. She just walked out with the clothes on her back. That was my mum. Tough. W...

On Being Heard

Is it me or does anyone else think they are not being heard? Doesn't it seem that these days folks don't  listen to what you are saying and instead they prepare a response even while you are still speaking?  I don't know about you but I find this frustrating. This behaviour is sometimes accompanied by the person you are talking with editorializing every few sentences you make which causes you to lose your train of thought. And of course, with the ubiquitous mobile phone, it is hard to tell if the person you are talking with is even listening, they are too busy checking something on FaceBook. But that is not so much an issue of a difference in linguistic styles as it is more about plain bad manners. My linguistic style can be passionate and animated especially if I am talking about something important to me. I don't know if it's my age or if I am not as mentally strong as I should be, but constant editorializing greatly distracts me. I also think that when I am i...