Skip to main content

CYNICS AND CRITICS


I love movies. I always have, so naturally, I took a course in film arts and though I’ve forgotten the intricacies, (the year was 1973); I still appreciate the art form.

For instance, the mood or tone of a movie begins with the opening music and credits. That whole thing has been crafted to set what the director thinks the tone of the movie should convey.

The goal of a film is to convince you, as the viewer, to willingly suspend your disbelief. The colour, texture, the music, camera angles and even the pace of the edit and scene changes, all conspire with the actors, the dialogue and the costumes, to make you lose your ascetic distance and become part of the experience. You, as the viewer, are persuaded to be part of the film and not apart from it. Movie viewing is intended as an inclusive experience.

The part of the bargain, the quid pro quo, when you pay for a ticket or a rental fee, is that you will put aside your cynicism and critique and allow the film the opportunity to create an alternative reality of which you are willingly a part.

None of this is possible if you are with people who insist on talking during the film. Interjecting their opinions about plot structure, acting ability or cinematography, causes you to be pulled back from the experience you paid for and can ruin a film’s chance of working it’s magic. Blurting out things like, “hey, is that the guy from…” or “my cousin has a dress like hers…” is torture for film aficionados. It violently rips them from the world so delicately created by the director and unceremoniously dumps them back into the real world. Now, to enjoy the film, they have to try anew to get back to the point where their disbelief was happily suspended.

With all that said, it is well within the right of the viewer to walk out on a bad film. If one has given the film every chance to weave it’s magic but it has failed to accomplish the goal, whether due to plot, poor writing, poor acting or poor direction, then by all means, walk out. And when asked or if you are so inclined, write about your experience. Yes, it is okay to inform others of your opinion, to discuss the film with some knowledge, just don't do it while the movie is playing.

When considering a movie, I look for three main things, in no particular order, preference or importance. I look for actors I have seen and liked in other performances. Sometimes, a good actor can save a bad movie or at the very least give the viewer a performance worth the price of admission despite the shortcomings of the film. James Stewart, Haille Berry, Tom Hanks, Meryl Streep, De Niro, Pacino, Diane Ladd, Cate Blanchett, Jessica Lange, Denzel Washington, Cuba Gooding Jr., to name a few of my favourites. There are many more, please don’t read anything into this list or my list of directors.

Likewise, I consider the director of films I have seen before and enjoyed. Ridley Scott, David Lean, Antoine Fuqua, John Ford, Spike Lee, Alfred Hitchcock, Brian De Palma, Sam Peckinpah, Steven Spielberg, Steven Soderbergh, Ron Howard, Kathyrn Bigelow, Nora Ephron are just a few of many I consider when choosing a movie.

If I see a movie starring actors I am not too familiar with or directed by someone whose work I don’t know, I will consider the writer of the screenplay or the book the movie is based upon. The plot must interest me. They say there are seven basic movie plots; Overcoming the Monster, Rags to Riches, The Quest, Voyage and Return, Comedy, Tragedy and Rebirth.

I was taught drama was conflict and usually consisted of man against nature, man against himself, man against man, man against society, man against gods or fate. And of course, there is the familiar motif of the man who becomes a hero, who becomes a god or something like it, King Arthur comes to mind. Joseph Campbell wrote about this motif as the hero with a thousand faces. George Lucas consulted Campbell when he was making Star Wars.

It is important to understand what you like. Going to a movie that holds no appeal for you is counter-productive and sure to be a waste of both your time and your money. For me, I do not enjoy musicals. The singing interrupts the drama for me; it pulls me back from the reality created by the piece. I have tried, but I simply do not enjoy musicals. Two notable exceptions come to mind, Fiddler on the Roof and Phantom of the Opera. And I must say, I think I would enjoy them more as a musical play rather than as a film. I know, that’s an obvious given, but we are talking only about the films here.

I love movies and taking into consideration the caveats I mentioned, parking your cynicism and critique at the door when you enter a movie theatre or rent a film at home, promotes a better movie experience by at least giving the film a chance to work its movie magic.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ON THE CUSP OF A RADICAL PARADIGM SHIFT

It has been a long time since I last wrote in this blog. I have been busy with music projects and writing novels. In fact, I am writing my ninth novel right now and am just taking a break. I wanted to get back into keeping up with my blog but didn't want  it to become a format for political rants. Let's be frank, the political landscape is abysmal and folks have never been so divided and so entrenched in their views. I am no exception! Rather than regurgitate the dogma and doctrine of one party over the other, I am guided by the tenets I have long adhered to: democracy, equality under the law, opportunity, justice and a strong social safety net. I welcome diversity in all forms. I believe we should all be accountable and responsible for our actions. Worker's rights, women's rights, these are important to me as basic human rights. Income inequality is a huge issue. Of course, captains of industry deserve the right to have the largest piece of the pie. T...

AESTHETIC DISTANCE

I love films. I have always loved films. In high school during the very early seventies, I was able to take a film arts course along with English courses, media and communications. I loved it. Film is art. The famous MGM logo with the lion’s roar that prefaces so many famous movies incorporates the Latin, “ARS GRATIA ARTIS” which means “art for art’s sake,” and was designed in 1916 by Howard Dietz. The saying is credited to the 19th century French philosopher, Victor Cousin and was written as “l’art pour l’art.” One of the basic lessons I learned in film arts was the concept of aesthetic distance.  This concept originally applied to literature refers to the gap between the readers, or as in the case of film, the viewer’s conscious reality and the fictional reality constructed by an author of a book or the director of the film.  Of course, in film there are so many more variables to be considered, actor’s craft, lighting, cinematography, music et ce...

THANK YOU MARCUS!

2019! Already? Yes, the New Year is now two days old as I am writing.  This is the year I turn sixty-five. I will retire in August and the plan is to sell the house and move to Florida. So, facing lots of major life changes.  The fact is I am moving even further away from my kids, my family, and friends in Canada. This saddens me a great deal. ( Of course, since our destination is to be Florida, they have all assured me they will be visiting us. I hope so. ) There is now more sand in the bottom of the hour glass than at the top and reflecting on my life causes me some consternation.  It is so because I am coming face to face with my own mediocrity.  I had hoped my passions of music, martial arts and writing would have brought more acclaim, more financial reward despite the fact I engaged in them from love and without the thought of financial recompense. My life’s mistakes haunt me, as do the consequences born from poor decisions.  Oh, I know,...