Skip to main content

THE WAY OF COMPATABILITY

Mr. Thomas Makiyama of Keijutsukai Aikido has a particular interpretation of the concept of Kokyu-ho as: “the way of compatibility.” This is an explanation that resonates with me. 

During my Hakkoryu Jujutsu training the same concept was referred to as “yielding,"  the avoidance of pitting force against force. 

“Surrender to win” is a phrase used in recovery programs to define a strategy of surrendering to a Higher Power rather than futilely banging one’s head on the wall of addiction. (I am stretching to the point of breaking in order to make a point, but I like the phrase).  I am not suggesting a religious meaning or implying anything outside of the human purview, but I think the phrase applies well to the concept of kokyu-ho. 

Life presents many tough challenges. Despite our fervent wishes and hopes we can never “force” something to happen in life. 
Acceptance, the ability to see reality as being accurate and real, is a sound strategy. 

Think of water in terms of life challenges. Water is resilient; punch it and it simply moves out of the way and then rushes back to instantly engulf your hand. Push against it and you will fall into the water for there is nothing pushing back at you (a tip of the hat here to Bruce Lee). 

And yet we all know how difficult it is to stand up against the crashing waves on the beach or walk chest deep the length of a pool. 

In fact, water can be the most devastating force in the world as we saw when a tsunami hit Southeast Asia on December 26, 2004. 

I am using the analogy of water to try and illustrate how when faced with difficult people or situations it may be futile for you to use force, to pit your energy against them. 

Sometimes “fighting back” is not the best strategy. Just like water gives way, it is also a strong force and so avoiding or yielding to a confrontation is not weakness but rather a strategy employed to save your serenity. 

Do you need to win every argument? Might it not be helpful to allow the other person to have their say, yield to them as it were, and then research their points later? When time and circumstance allow, you can determine the weight and accuracy of your argument versus theirs. 

If you are satisfied with the facts and rationale of your position, that what you posit has adequate evidence to rationally support your conclusions then you can come back and re-affirm your position with authority. Or not. 

Is it important to you that the person who disagrees with you knows they are wrong? Will your well-researched, logically crafted argument change their point of view? 

Will it matter if it does? 

Could it be that they have a different point-of-view from yours and the best outcome is for you both is to agree to differ? 
When confronted with an obnoxious person who gets in your face, is un-cooperative, yelling at you, there is no need for you to reply in kind. Why escalate the situation?

A better strategy might be to employ the concept of kokyu-ho and yield. Lower your voice, create a distance and if they are still belligerent, walk away, refuse to engage; do not pit force against force. 

Be then as water, resilient and fluid. Yield, surrender to win, avoid pitting force against force, but when necessary, harness the power of a tsunami.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nirvana

I can no more cease to write than you can stop breathing. It is my salvation. Writing is my path to Nirvana, where suffering has been extinguished, and complete peace is realized, if you believe that sort of thing. I'm not sure that I do, but it's a nice sentiment. For me, since I must work at doing something that fails to excite me in any meaningful way, I must search for my own meaning. Writing is the vehicle I use now. It used to be that my path lay with studying martial arts, but life changes, the body wearies. I suspect many of us, no, most of us, are in the same boat. We are trying to manage our lives the best we can while searching for Nirvana, our own private paradise, or however we might  describe it. Viktor Frankl wrote Man's Search for Meaning. He posits that our meaning is what we choose it to be and that meaning may change day to day. He said, "“Those who have a 'why' to live, can bear with almost any 'how'.” Following your passion ...

Authentic Living

How hard do you suppose it might be for someone to suddenly adopt an existential life style of living authentically? The idea of freely choosing one’s own purpose, deciding what is meaningful, living one’s life on one’s own terms with no thought of what others may think nor any thought given as to how this choice of living will affect them, must surely be a costly venture. Can it be done without tearing apart relationships? Should that really even be a consideration? To be what many would consider a non-conformist, to have autonomy over one’s own life, is to transcend socialization, to resist the allure and not be seduced by what is essentially the easy ways of a conformist. But at what cost? Should it give one pause to consider, before embarking on a life of free choices, to live by your own standards, to do what you will, when you will it, and how you will it to be done, what the consequences will be on those we love? Aren’t such people, who choose to live so freely, reviled r...

Examine Your Life

What makes you tick? Who are you and what do you stand for? What do you stand against? Most of us absorb our values from our parents, community, and culture. We grow up with much the same set of principals as our parents. If our parents are Christian then most likely we are Christian. The same can be said if our parents our Muslim or Jewish. It may even be that if our parents our liberal or conservative we will follow suit. Not all of us, however, fall into line. Some of us are rebellious. We question the premise these values we inherited were based upon. And if we don’t get the right answers, if the arguments for holding on to these values are weak, then we may discard them and adopt principles more reflective of our own morality. But we cannot do any of this unless we examine our lives. We need to discover what we are all about, what we will accept, and what we will abhor. We need to look inward to discover ourselves. For as Socrates said, the unexamined life is not wort...