Skip to main content

THE WAY OF COMPATABILITY

Mr. Thomas Makiyama of Keijutsukai Aikido has a particular interpretation of the concept of Kokyu-ho as: “the way of compatibility.” This is an explanation that resonates with me. 

During my Hakkoryu Jujutsu training the same concept was referred to as “yielding,"  the avoidance of pitting force against force. 

Surrender to win” is a phrase used in recovery programs to define a strategy of surrendering to a Higher Power rather than futilely banging one’s head on the wall of addiction. (I am stretching to the point of breaking in order to make a point, but I like the phrase).  I am not suggesting a religious meaning or implying anything outside of the human purview, but I think the phrase applies well to the concept of kokyu-ho. 

Life presents many tough challenges. Despite our fervent wishes and hopes we can never “force” something to happen in life. 
Acceptance, the ability to see reality as being accurate and real, is a sound strategy. 

Think of water in terms of life challenges. Water is resilient; punch it and it simply moves out of the way and then rushes back to instantly engulf your hand. Push against it and you will fall into the water for there is nothing pushing back at you (a tip of the hat here to Bruce Lee). 

And yet we all know how difficult it is to stand up against the crashing waves on the beach or walk chest deep the length of a pool. 

In fact, water can be the most devastating force in the world as we saw when a tsunami hit Southeast Asia on December 26, 2004. 

I am using the analogy of water to try and illustrate how when faced with difficult people or situations it may be futile for you to use force, to pit your energy against them. 

Sometimes “fighting back” is not the best strategy. Just like water gives way, it is also a strong force and so avoiding or yielding to a confrontation is not weakness but rather a strategy employed to save your serenity. 

Do you need to win every argument? Might it not be helpful to allow the other person to have their say, yield to them as it were, and then research their points later? When time and circumstance allow, you can determine the weight and accuracy of your argument versus theirs. 

If you are satisfied with the facts and rationale of your position, that what you posit has adequate evidence to rationally support your conclusions then you can come back and re-affirm your position with authority. Or not. 

Is it important to you that the person who disagrees with you knows they are wrong? Will your well-researched, logically crafted argument change their point of view? 

Will it matter if it does? 

Could it be that they have a different point-of-view from yours and the best outcome is for you both is to agree to differ? 
When confronted with an obnoxious person who gets in your face, is un-cooperative, yelling at you, there is no need for you to reply in kind. Why escalate the situation?

A better strategy might be to employ the concept of kokyu-ho and yield. Lower your voice, create a distance and if they are still belligerent, walk away, refuse to engage; do not pit force against force. 

Be then as water, resilient and fluid. Yield, surrender to win, avoid pitting force against force, but when necessary, harness the power of a tsunami.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ON THE CUSP OF A RADICAL PARADIGM SHIFT

It has been a long time since I last wrote in this blog. I have been busy with music projects and writing novels. In fact, I am writing my ninth novel right now and am just taking a break. I wanted to get back into keeping up with my blog but didn't want  it to become a format for political rants. Let's be frank, the political landscape is abysmal and folks have never been so divided and so entrenched in their views. I am no exception! Rather than regurgitate the dogma and doctrine of one party over the other, I am guided by the tenets I have long adhered to: democracy, equality under the law, opportunity, justice and a strong social safety net. I welcome diversity in all forms. I believe we should all be accountable and responsible for our actions. Worker's rights, women's rights, these are important to me as basic human rights. Income inequality is a huge issue. Of course, captains of industry deserve the right to have the largest piece of the pie. T

POSTURE

It is acceptable in martial arts to adopt any particular kamae, or “posture,” as an expression of one’s self in an artistic or stylistic manner provided it is a sound stratagem in and of itself or that the individual is so adept at the posture it makes her effective in a self-defence scenario.  In many cases, a particular kamae or posture signals the style of martial art the person has studied. The straight up posture, fists clenched, arms out and slightly bent, legs in a wide stance could indicate a karate practitioner. Arms up, away from the body, palms toward the opponent, might mean a Muay Thai fighter. The various forms of Kung Fu, indicating the Tiger, the Dragon or the Praying Mantis are distinguished by their exotic postures, and so on. How we present ourselves in daily life and in a non-martial context gives people hints about ourselves. Whatever way we present ourselves can be considered our kamae, our posture.  This begs the questions, just how does the world perc

AESTHETIC DISTANCE

I love films. I have always loved films. In high school during the very early seventies, I was able to take a film arts course along with English courses, media and communications. I loved it. Film is art. The famous MGM logo with the lion’s roar that prefaces so many famous movies incorporates the Latin, “ARS GRATIA ARTIS” which means “art for art’s sake,” and was designed in 1916 by Howard Dietz. The saying is credited to the 19th century French philosopher, Victor Cousin and was written as “l’art pour l’art.” One of the basic lessons I learned in film arts was the concept of aesthetic distance.  This concept originally applied to literature refers to the gap between the readers, or as in the case of film, the viewer’s conscious reality and the fictional reality constructed by an author of a book or the director of the film.  Of course, in film there are so many more variables to be considered, actor’s craft, lighting, cinematography, music et cetera.